Introduction
Managers and leaders in any organization are expected to influence the actions of their employees through several channels. Some of these include communicating with staff members, stimulating subordinates to work hard and ensuring that all the resources within the company are allocated well. These expectations can either be met successfully or unsuccessfully. Numerous researchers felt the need to come up with theories that govern successful leadership. One of these theories is known as the contingency theory.
An analysis of the contingency theory
Fielder (1964) came up with this approach to leadership after realizing that leaders could function well if they changed their styles to suit the situation at hand. This is where the name contingency originates. Fielder conducted several studies of effective and ineffective leaders. Thereafter he concluded that the most successful approach Packers Finley Women's Jersey would be to match organizational settings with leadership styles. These two parameters form the basis of the contingency theory of leadership.
According to Fiedler,
Unfriendly versus friendly workers
Hostile versus supportive
Guarded versus open
Uncooperative versus cooperative (Fiedler, 1964)
All the latter traits are in ascending order with Packers Finley Women's Jersey number 1 representing the character trait on the left while number 8 represents the character trait on the right.
The LPC? scale's main purpose is to determine whether a particular form of leadership style is task oriented or people oriented. Leaders who score high marks in the scale favor interpersonal relationships. Consequently, those leaders who rate their co-workers in a negative light may be more interested in the task at hand. This also implies that such leaders have poor interpersonal relationships. However, critics have asserted that such traits may not necessarily be accurate. Some individuals may portray their co-workers in a negative light but still be keen on interpersonal relationships.
没有评论:
发表评论